The Officer Basin in South Australia and Western Australia is the focus of a regional stratigraphic study being undertaken by the Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program, an Australian Government initiative dedicated to increasing investment in resource exploration in Australia. This data release provides data from new digital photography, X-ray Computerised Tomography (XCT) scanning, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and tensile strength, laboratory ultrasonic testing, and gas porosity and permeability experiments for 41 samples from five legacy stratigraphic and petroleum exploration boreholes drilled within the Officer Basin. Additional low permeability tests were undertaken on select samples that were identified as being ultra-tight (permeability <1 µD). These samples were analysed at CSIRO Geomechanics and Geophysics Laboratory in Perth during April to June 2021.

The first phase of the Australian Government's Exploring for the Future (EFTF) was a multi-year (2016-2020) $100.5 million initiative to increase northern Australia's desirability as a destination for industry investment to stimulate ‘greenfield’ resource exploration. In order to support this fundamental objective of the EFTF program, Geoscience Australia conducted acquisition of a diverse range of new precompetitive datasets across northern Australia, focussing on regions of unrecognised mineral, energy and groundwater resource potential. The Barkly 2D Deep Crustal Reflection Seismic Survey (L212) was acquired in 2019 as a major objective of the EFTF program in partnership with, and co-funded by, the NT Government under the Resourcing the Territory initiative. The Barkly Seismic Survey extends from the newly discovered Carrara Sub-basin in the South Nicholson Basin region to the south-eastern margins of the Beetaloo Sub-basin (Fomin, T., et al. 2019). The Barkly Seismic Survey images interpreted Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic successions extending from the Carrara Sub-basin to the highly prospective Beetaloo Sub-basin of the McArthur Basin. These successions are concealed by a persistent cover of up to 600 m of Paleozoic Georgina Basin sediments. Interpretation of the Barkly Seismic Survey established three informal geological domains, each defined by structural elements and/or basin characteristics (Southby et al, 2021). This data set contains an exported set of XYZ points from interpreted horizons (Southby et al 2022,) on the Barkly Seismic Survey (L212) in both two way time (TWT ms on PreSTM_19ga lines) and depth (m) re-interpreted on depth indexed PreSDM_19GA lines. The coordinate reference system for this dataset is WGS 1984 Australian Centre for Remote Sensing Lambert. Seismic reference datum is 350 m. The seismic reference datum are described in the EBCDIC headers of the SEGY files for each of the survey lines. Fomin, T., Costelloe, R.D., Holzschuh, J. 2019. L212 Barkly 2D Seismic Survey. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/132890 Southby, C., Rollet, N., Carson, C., Carr, L., Henson, P., Fomin, T., Costelloe, R., Doublier, M., Close, D. 2021. The Exploring for the Future 2019 Barkly Reflection Seismic Survey: Key discoveries and implication for resources. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/145107 Southby, C., Carson, C.J., Fomin, T., Rollet, N., Henson, P.A., Carr, L.K., Doublier, M.P., Close, D. 2022. Exploring for the Future - The 2019 Barkly Reflection Seismic Survey (L212). RECORD: 2022/009. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2022.009

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government program led by Geoscience Australia, in partnership with state and Northern Territory governments. The first phase of the EFTF program (2016-2020) aimed to drive industry investment in resource exploration in frontier regions of northern Australia by providing new precompetitive data and information about their energy, mineral and groundwater resource potential (Carr et al 2018). The South Nicholson Basin and immediate surrounding region is situated between Paleo-Mesoproterozoic Mount Isa Province and McArthur Basin. Both the Mount Isa Province and McArthur Basin are well studied. By contrast, the adjacent South Nicholson region is less studied, and contains rocks that are mostly undercover, for which the basin evolution and resource potential is not well understood. To address this gap, the L210 South Nicholson Deep Crustal Seismic Survey was collected in 2017 in the region between the southern McArthur Basin to the Mount Isa western succession, crossing the South Nicholson Basin and Murphy Province, providing a fundamental data link across these regions (L210 South Nicholson Deep Crustal Seismic Reflection Survey). The primary aim of the survey was to investigate areas with a low measured gravity response in the region to determine whether they represent thick basin sequences, as is the case for the nearby prospective Beetaloo Sub-basin. The interpretation of this survey led to the discovery of a new basin, the Carrara Sub-basin, coinciding with a gravity low in the south-eastern South Nicholson Basin Region. This data set contains an exported set of XYZ points from interpreted horizons (Carr et al 2019) on the South Nicholson Seismic Survey (L210) in both two way time (TWT ms on PreSTM_17ga lines) and depth (m) re-interpreted on depth indexed PreSDM_17GA lines. The coordinate reference system for this dataset is WGS 1984 Australian Centre for Remote Sensing Lambert. Seismic reference datum is 350 m. The seismic reference datum are described in the EBCDIC headers of the SEGY files for each of the survey lines. Carr, L.K., Southby, C., Henson, P., Costello, R., Anderson, J.R., Jarrett, A.J M., Carson, C.J., Gorton, J., Hutton, L.J., Troup, A., Williams, B., Khider, K., Bailey, A. & Fomin, T. 2019. Exploring for the Future: South Nicholson Basin geological summary and seismic interpretation. Record 2019/21, Geoscience Australia, Canberra. http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2019.021 Carr, L.K., Southby, C., Henson, P., Anderson, J.R., Costelloe, R., Jarrett, A.J.M., Carson, C.J., MacFarlane, S.K., Gorton, J., Hutton, L., Troup, A, Williams, B., Khider, K., Bailey, A.H.E., Fomin, T. 2020. South Nicholson Basin seismic interpretation. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/132029 L210 South Nicholson Deep Crustal Seismic Reflection Survey, NT and QLD, 2017. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/116881.

<div>The Curnamona Province and overlying basins (herein referred to as the Broken Hill region) contain many discrete groundwater systems. These include sedimentary aquifers of the Lake Eyre Basin, Eromanga Basin, Darling Basin and Arrowie Basin, as well as fractured rock aquifers of the Adelaide Superbasin and Curnamona Province. However, there is little known about the hydrogeology or hydrogeochemistry of these aquifers in the Broken Hill region. Given the semi-arid climate in this region, understanding these groundwater systems can better support sustainable use of the groundwater for agriculture, mining and potable water supplies.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Aquifer attribution provides a fundamental starting point for any hydrogeological study. We will present recently released hydrogeochemical data for the Broken Hill region, and our subsequent process for assessing and attributing hydrostratigraphy to the samples. </div><div>The Broken Hill Groundwater Geochemistry dataset (BHGG) was recently released in its entirety (Caritat et al. 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2022.020). It contains a compilation of archival CRC LEME hydrochemistry data that was collected as part of several projects from 1999 to 2005. This high-quality dataset contains 275 groundwater samples and includes a comprehensive suite of majors, minors, trace elements and stable isotopes (δ34S, δ18O, δ2H, δ13C, 87Sr/86Sr, 208/207/206Pb/204Pb). </div><div> At the time of collection, some key bore metadata (e.g. bore depths, screen and aquifer information) were missing from the original data compilations and these metadata are crucial for any hydrogeological analysis and interpretation. Therefore, as part of the new BHGG data release we have developed a robust and consistent approach to add bore information and aquifer attribution, value-adding to the original BHGG chemical and isotopic data. This workflow utilises a combination of State databases, reports, field notes, drillhole compilations and geological maps, but still relied on local hydrological expertise to make decisions when encountering incomplete or conflicting information (which is reflected by a confidence rating on the attribution). </div><div> The resulting BHGG product has supported re-assessment of the key hydrogeological and geochemical knowledge gaps in each groundwater system. An overview of knowledge gaps and the new sampling program being undertaken will be included in the presentation. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div>This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2022 Australasian Groundwater Conference 21-23 November (https://agc2022.com.au/)

<div>As part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program, the Curnamona Geochemistry project is producing a comprehensive compilation of geochemical data from the Broken Hill region, encompassing rock, regolith and groundwater. As part of these efforts, geochemical data has been compiled, cleaned and standardised to enable more seamless interpretation and exploration of geochemical anomalies. This project improves the quality, accessibility and volume of geochemical data across the Curnamona region and supports our ongoing efforts to define regional geochemical baselines.</div> This presentation was given to the 2022 Geological Survey of South Australia (GSSA) Discovery Day 1 December (https://www.energymining.sa.gov.au/home/events-and-initiatives/discovery-day)

<div>Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program provides precompetitive information to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, we are building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This leads to a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. This includes supporting Australia’s transition to net zero emissions, strong, sustainable resources and agriculture sectors, and economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. The Exploring for the Future program, which commenced in 2016, is an eight year, $225m investment by the Australian Government.</div><div><br></div><div>During February and March in 2023, Geoscience Australia undertook the Curnamona Cube Extension Magnetotelluric (MT) Survey in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia. The survey complements the University of Adelaide/AuScope Curnamona Cube MT survey by extending the coverage from the Curnamona Province into the Delamerian Orogen. Geoscience Australia contracted Quantec Geoscience Ltd. and its subcontractor Australian Geophysical Services to conduct the data acquisition and processing.&nbsp;Audio and broadband MT data was acquired at 99 sites on an approximately 12.5-25&nbsp;km grid with denser sites across known geological structures and along seismic lines acquired by Geoscience Australia in 2022 (L213 Darling-Curnamona-Delamerian (DCD) 2D Seismic Survey, eCAT # 147423). Instruments were set up to record five channels (three magnetic and two electric fields) for a minimum of 24 hours with a target bandwidth of 0.0001 – 1000 s. Processed data show good quality at a majority of the survey sites, except a few sites affected by environmental and cultural noise. The acquired data will be used to derive resistivity models, and to enhance the understanding of the geodynamics and mineral potential in the Curnamona Province and Delamerian Orogen.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>This data release contains a field logistic report; processed data in EDI format containing spectra and site locations in shape file and .txt format. Time series data in ASCII format is available on request from clientservices@ga.gov.au - Quote eCAT#147904.</div><div><br></div><div>Geoscience Australia acknowledges the traditional landowners, private landholders and national park authorities within the survey region, without whose cooperation these data could not have been collected.</div><div><br></div>

<div>Geoscience Australia has a large holding of surface sediment samples, such as stream and overbank sediments, from geochemical surveys conducted over more than 50 years across the Australian continent. Geochemical data from these surface materials are of national importance as they can contribute significantly to establishing geochemical environmental baselines and their use in land management, as well as aiding in the discovery of new mineral deposits. Samples from these legacy surveys provide valuable insights into areas of Australia that are remote, difficult to access, or have since been developed. The age of a large number of these surveys, however, means that the original results included data for a&nbsp;smaller range of chemical elements, typically with poorer analytical precision and accuracy than those of modern surveys. This small range of chemical elements also typically doesn’t include important elements for modern use, such as critical minerals (i.e. Co, Bi, REEs), which are increasing in their importance. As part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program, a collection of over 9000 samples from these surveys was reanalysed using modern analytical techniques for a&nbsp;suite of 60 chemical elements. These samples cover several regions within Australia, including Kakadu, Cape York, the Mount Isa region, and near the Canberra region. The new analytical data maximise the value of the historical geochemical surveys and will provide new insights into the mineral potential of these regions and improve the quality of geochemical environmental baselines.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>This data release includes: 1) information on the surveys and their samples; 2) quality assurance results; 3) a discussion of sample preparation and analytical methods used; 4) results for total content geochemistry (XRF and LA-ICP-MS); and 5) individual element maps for each of the regions for preliminary interpretation of the data.</div><div><br></div><div>Acquisition and release of this dataset forms part of a larger program aimed at creating a levelled geochemical baseline for the whole Australia (Main and Champion, 2020).</div>

<div>Indicator minerals are those minerals that indicate the presence of a specific mineral deposit, alteration or lithology[1]. Their utility to the exploration industry has been demonstrated in a range of environments and across multiple deposit types including Cu-Au porphyry[2], Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag VMS[3] and Ni-Cu-PGE[4]. Recent developments in the field of SEM-EDS analysis have enabled the rapid quantitative identification of indicator minerals during regional sampling campaigns[4,5].</div><div>Despite the demonstrated utility of indicator minerals for diamond and base metal exploration in Canada, Russia and Africa, there are relatively few case studies published from Australian deposits. We present the results of an indicator mineral case study over the Julimar exploration project located 90 km NE of Perth. The Gonneville Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, discovered by Chalice Mining in 2020, is hosted within a ~30 km long belt of 2670 Ma ultramafic intrusions within the western margin of the Yilgarn Craton[6].</div><div>Stream sediments collected from drainage channels around the Gonneville deposit were analysed by quantitative mineralogy techniques to determine if a unique indicator mineral footprint exists there. Samples were processed and analysed for heavy minerals using a workflow developed for the Curtin University-Geoscience Australia Heavy Mineral Map of Australia project[7]. Results indicate elevated abundances of indicator minerals associated with ultramafic/mafic magmatism and Ni-sulfide mineralisation in the drainages within the Julimar project area, including pyrrhotite, pentlandite, pyrite and chromite. We conclude that indicator mineral studies using automated mineralogy are powerful, yet currently underutilised, tools for mineral exploration in Australian environments.</div><div>[1]McClenaghan, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/03-066 </div><div>[2]Hashmi et al., 2015. https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2014-310 </div><div>[3]Lougheed et al., 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10040310 </div><div>[4]McClenaghan &amp; Cabri, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/10-IM-026 </div><div>[5]Porter et al., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103406 </div><div>[6]Lu et al., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35768.47367 </div><div>[7]Caritat et al., 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12080961 </div> This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2023 Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference 13-18 Mar (https://2023.aegc.com.au/)

<div>Levelling of geochemical data between surveys is a vital step in using datasets together. This code can apply a number of approaches to eliminate inter-laboratory differences from multi-generational and spatially isolated geochemical surveys. This codes allow the use of a variety of levelling methods: re-analysis, single standards, and multiple standards. The methodology and effectiveness of each of these methods are outlined in Main, P.T. and Champion, D.C., 2022. Levelling of multi-generational and spatially isolated geochemical surveys. Journal of Geochemical Exploration.</div>

<div>The Australian continent comprises a broad dichotomy of crustal settings; from the Archean–Proterozoic cratonic core in the centre and west, to the accretionary margin of the Tasmanides in the east. These continental blocks meet at the Tasman Line, where successive arc systems built the eastern third of Australia in ca. 250 Myrs. This interface represents one of Australia’s most fundamental crustal boundaries and is marked by the ca. 520–490 Ma Delamerian Orogen in south-eastern Australia. Despite its first-order crustal control on tectonism, magmatism, deformation, and mineral systems in the area, the Delamerian Orogen remains poorly understood. Here, we present new zircon Hf-O isotopic and trace element data on 32 samples across the south-east Tasman Line. This initial dataset, which will grow over the next 12 months as part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program, will be used to constrain the time-space crustal architecture and evolution of Australia’s south-eastern Precambrian cratonic margin. These first samples include Paleoarchean to Devonian felsic magmatic rocks from the eastern Gawler Craton, across the Delamerian Orogen, to the Central Lachlan Orogen, and show that the crust of south-east Australia has a significant pre-history, with crustal reworking a major feature across the region. Delamerian arc magmatism appears to have involved significant reworking of Australia’s south-eastern Precambrian margin, as recorded by sub-chondritic Hf-isotope data. Assuming a significant mantle-component in the initial arc magmas, contamination by the ancient overlying continental rocks, some as old as ca. 3250 Ma, resulted in less juvenile compositions. This observation suggests Australia’s south-eastern Gondwanan margin may have consisted of a west-dipping continental arc, rather than an offshore island arc. The ‘heavy’ supracrustal δ18O of magmatic rocks across the area since the Paleoproterozoic is testament to the long-lived terrestrial nature of this continental margin, and its influence on magmatism across >1 billion years of Earth history.&nbsp;</div> This Abstract was submitted/presented to the 2022 Specialist Group in Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Petrology (SGGMP) Conference 7-11 November (https://gsasggmp.wixsite.com/home/biennial-conference-2021)